• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
eco-jurisprudence monitor logo

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Tracker
    • Report Initiative
    • Printable Charts
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • Toolkit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Our Story
    • Tracker FAQ
    • Get Involved
    • Contact Us
  • English
    • Español

Ecuador court case on the oil spill in the San Rafael Waterfall

Ecuador
Province of Orellana
On Appeal in 2021
Case
Indigenous Model, Rights Of Nature
Nature
All Nature
the Autonomous Decentralized Parochial Government of Guayusa; the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of the Ecuadorian Amazon; the Ceibo Alliance Foundation; the Ecumenical Human Rights Commission; the Ecology Action Corporation; the Latin American Association for Alternative Development; the Alejandra Labaka Foundation; the Center for Support and Protection of Human Rights "SURKUNA"; the Union of affected and affected by the operations of Texaco; the Federation of United Communes of the Kichwa Nationality of the Ecuadorian Amazon; Jorge Acero Gonzalez and Carlos Mazabanda Calle
Civil Society, Indigenous, NGO

Summary

On April 30, 2020, thirty-two groups in Ecuador filed an action in provincial court seeking protection of human rights and precautionary measures against the national oil company of Ecuador, a major pipeline company, and the Ecuadorian government, due to the rupture of oil pipelines near the San Rafael Waterfall on April 7, 2020 – spilling approximately fifteen thousand barrels of crude oil and gasoline base – which affected the Coca and Napo rivers, and caused irreparable damage to one hundred and nine ancestral communities. The plaintiffs are part of and/or are representatives of indigenous communities and argue that their constitutional rights to life, water, food, health, territory in relation to the identity of indigenous peoples, to the environment, to nature, and to information, have been violated” (3) and that the impact of the oil spill violates the rights recognized to Nature by Article 71 of the Ecuadorian constitution (Provincial court ruling, 19).

On October 10, 2020 the provincial court of Orellana denied the action “because there was no evidence of a violation of rights”, and on March 23, 2021 rejected the subsequent appeal.

On April 29, 2021, the Constitutional Court of Ecuador accepted the case and will analyze the alleged impact on the rights to a healthy environment and health of ancestral communities, and the rights of nature.

The action was filed against the national oil company of Ecuador (Petroecuador); the Heavy Crude Oil Pipeline Company (OCP); the Ministry of Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources; the Ministry of the Environment; the Ministry of Public Health; and the Attorney General’s Office.

Legal Document

To see the original legal document(s) for this initiative, click the links below:

[Spanish] Provincial court ruling – San Rafael Waterfall oil spill case [PDF]
[English] Provincial court ruling – San Rafael Waterfall oil spill case [PDF]
[Spanish] Case selection by the Constitutional Court – San Rafael Waterfall oil spill case [PDF]
[English] Case selection by the Constitutional Court – San Rafael Waterfall oil spill case [PDF]

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Footer

Privacy Policy

Contact

  • Tracker
  • News
  • About
  • English
  • Español

© 2025 Eco Jurisprudence Monitor – all rights reserved.