Summary
In 2014, environmental activists and an indigenous pastorate filed a constitutional lawsuit for protective action against ERVIC S.A.—a private company represented by its general manager Jorge Enrique Holguin Gomez and owned by Carlos Rhor Romeno—for the placement of a pine tree plantation via a government reforestation program in the Paramo of Tangabana. The plaintiffs argued that the pine plantation violated the rights of the Paramo of Tangabana because it affects the existence and life cycles of the paramo. The plaintiffs also argued that the rights of defenders of nature were violated because “the community members have suffered physical and verbal attacks for exercising their defense of the rights of nature.” Judges denied the case and appeals repeatedly because the plaintiffs did not prove their ownership of the paramo and their evidence was not presented with respective testimony.
Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2025. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor.https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/pine-plantation-in-tangabana/.
When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.
Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0