• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Monitor
  • Data
    • Initiative Index
    • Report Initiative
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • English
    • Español

Ecuador Court Case: constitutionality of the Mining Law (2009)

Ecuador
Failed in 2010
National
Court Case
Rights Of Nature
Nature
All Nature
CONAIE
Indigenous, NGO

Summary

The Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (CONAIE) presented actions of unconstitutionality by the Mining Law in 2009. The actions argued the law violates the constitutional right to prior consultation of indigenous peoples and nationalities and rights of nature. The Constitutional Court ruling establishes the difference between prior environmental consultation and prior consultation for indigenous peoples and nationalities. It declared in a ruling that there is nothing that regulates pre-legislative consultation and that any mining activity that is intended to be carried out in the territory of indigenous peoples and nationalities must go through a prior consultation process.

Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2025. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor.https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/unconstitutionality-of-the-e40-mining-law/.

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Legal Document

Ecuador Constitutional Court Ruling on Constitionality of Mining Law
Access PDF

Additional Resources

Case Summary
Visit Resource

Footer

  • Monitor
  • Data
  • About
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Privacy Policy
© 2025 Eco Jurisprudence
Monitor – all rights reserved

Track ecological jurisprudence worldwide with our newsletter

Subscribe