Summary
In 2020, representatives of different local and indigenous communities in the Sucumbíos province, Putumayo canton, El Carmen de Putumayo, Palma Roja, and Santa Elena filed a public action of unconstitutionality against Ministerial Agreement No. 080 issued by the Ministry of the Environment, for violations of the constitutional rights of their communities and nature. This case refers to the unconstitutionality of articles 1 to 8 of the Agreement, which declare the area called Cuembí Triangle within the Sucumbíos province as Forest and Protective Vegetation. The Agreement implied the militarization of the ancestral territories of Kichwa communities and the prohibition of the ruling of lands to possessors settled in the area.
The Constitutional Court declared that the agreement is unconstitutional for violating the rights of Indigenous peoples. It said the agreement could serve a legitimate purpose, but a consultation process is imperative. The Court declared that although environmental conservation and the protection of the rights of Nature a noble goal, it cannot be achieved at the cost of the denial of the rights of peoples, communities and nationalities. Instead, it must be achieved in harmony with these rights.
Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2026. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/unconstitutionality-of-the-declaration-of-the-cuembi-triangle-as-a-protective-forest/.
When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.
Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0