Summary
On October 23rd of 2025, a private member’s bill was introduced in the UK House of Lords by the former leader of the Green party Baroness Natalie Bennett. The bill seeks to fundamentally change how UK law treats the natural world, and proposes recognizing Nature as a legal subject with inherent rights.
At the core of the proposal is an Integrated Rights Framework that embeds human rights, economic activity, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals within planetary boundaries. The bill establishes a legal duty of care toward Nature for all public bodies, businesses, and individuals, requiring decision-making to respect ecological limits both domestically and internationally. It also mandates Rights Impact Assessments for activities with significant environmental impacts, ensuring that development aligns with Nature’s rights.
The bill introduces new governance bodies, including a Nature Guardianship Council to oversee implementation and resolve disputes, Bioregional Councils to apply the law at a local ecological scale, and an independent Nature’s Rights Tribunal as a last-resort forum focused on enforcement and restorative justice. Compliance would be monitored through annual reporting, phased implementation targets, and independent verification, supported by incentives such as grants and tax reliefs to encourage regenerative practices.
The UK Parliament explains that Private Members’ bills are public bills introduced by MPs and Lords who are not government ministers. As with other public bills their purpose is to change the law as it applies to the general population. A minority of Private Members’ bills become law but, by creating publicity around an issue, they may affect legislation indirectly. Like other public bills, Private Members’ bills can be introduced in either House and must go through the same set stages. However, as less time is allocated to these bills, it is less likely that they will proceed through all the stages.
Impact Statement
The chances of legislative success for a private members’ bills are small because such proposals are typically unlikely to be debated, as well as because of strong political opposition from the anti-environment, anti-regulation right wing. However, Jonathan Elmer, the Green Party’s nature spokesperson, said the bill should be seen as part of a long-term strategy for advancing the rights of nature and other radical forms of progressive political restructuring.
Involved Organizations
Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2026. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/uk-rights-of-nature-law-2025/.
When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.
Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0