• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
eco-jurisprudence monitor logo

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Tracker
    • Report Initiative
    • Printable Charts
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • Toolkit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Our Story
    • Tracker FAQ
    • Get Involved
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • English
    • Español

Popular consultation for the prohibition of mining activities in Azuay

Ecuador
National
Rejected in 2020
Case
Rights Of Nature
Nature
All Nature
Mayors from cantons across the province of Azuay and representatives of communities
Civil Society, Government, Indigenous

Summary

Several cantons in the province of Azuay in Ecuador proposed a popular consultation for the prohibition of mining activities in the protective forests that surround El Cajas National Park. The consultants requested a prior opinion of constitutionality be issued on two questions. The first question was, “Do you agree with the prohibition, without exception of prospecting, exploration and exploitation of artisanal metal mining, small, medium and large scale, in water sources, areas of recharge, discharge and water regulation, moors, wetlands, forests protectors and fragile ecosystems in the province of Azuay?” The second question was, “Do you agree to cancel the metallic mining concessions that have been granted prior to this Popular Consultation, in water sources, water recharge, discharge and regulation areas, moors, wetlands, protective forests and fragile ecosystems in the province of Azuay?” The Constitutional Court ruled the consultation does not comply with the parameters of formal and material control established in the constitution as well as the Organic Law of Jurisdictional Guarantees and Control. It denied the request.

Legal Document

To see the original legal document(s) for this initiative, click the links below:

Claim to Constitutional Court for Popular Consultation on Mining in Azuay []
Ecuador Constitutional Court Dictamen No 1-20-CP/20 []
Opinion by Judge Lozada Prado in Dictamen No 1-20-CP/20 []
Judgment by Judge Herreria Bonnet in Dictamen 1-20-CP/20 []

Additional Resources

To see other supplementary information related to this initiative, click the links below:

Summary of case

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Footer

Privacy Policy

Contact

  • Tracker
  • News
  • About
  • Donate
  • English
  • Español

© 2025 Eco Jurisprudence Monitor – all rights reserved.