• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Monitor
  • Data
    • Initiative Index
    • Report Initiative
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • English
    • Español

USA Court Case: Naruto v. Slater (copyright of a macaque monkey “selfie”)

USA
Failed in 2018
National
Court Case
Animal Rights, Rights Of Nature
Naruto (Crested Macaque Monkey)
Animal
PETA
NGO

Summary

In 2018, the US Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of copyright infringement claims filed by PETA as a next friend to Naruto, a monkey who took “selfies” with a wildlife photographer’s camera. The claim declared that “Naruto should be afforded the protection of a claim of ownership, and the right to recover damages and other relief for copyright infringement.” The court ruled that Naruto lacked standing because the Copyright Act does not explicitly authorize animals to file copyright infringement suits.

Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2026. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/naruto-v-slater/.

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Legal Document

Naruto v Slater Claim
Access PDF
Naruto v Slater Appeals Judgment
Access PDF

Additional Resources

Summary of case
Visit Resource
Claim summary
Visit Resource

Footer

  • Monitor
  • Data
  • About
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Privacy Policy
© 2026 Eco Jurisprudence
Monitor – all rights reserved

Track ecological jurisprudence worldwide with our newsletter

Subscribe