• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Monitor
  • Data
    • Initiative Index
    • Report Initiative
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • English
    • Español

12th Local Rights of Nature Tribunal: Yesah 2024

North Carolina, USA
Approved in 2024
International
Civil Society Tribunal
Indigenous Model, Rights Of Nature
Haw River Ecosystem
Freshwater Ecosystem
7 Directions of Service; Movement Rights; Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature (GARN)
Indigenous, NGO

Summary

On June 1 2024, the International Rights of Nature Tribunal held its 12th local hearing at the Haw River State Park in North Carolina. The Yesah Tribunal was brought against the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) and plans for its extension into North Carolina via the MVP Southgate. The Mountain Valley Pipeline is an incomplete, underground 42-inch fracked gas transmission pipeline project that is steamrolling its way over life-giving water and land across 303 miles, from northern West Virginia to southern Virginia. Frontline communities and Water Protectors have been fighting the harmful, unnecessary pipeline for nearly 10 years, and came extremely close to canceling it.

A central focus of the Tribunal was the Haw River, a vital waterway serving numerous cities and towns in its watershed. The Tribunal gathered testimonies from 13 witnesses and experts directly affected by the MVP and its proposed extension into North Carolina, presenting scientific evidence on pipeline hazards and personal stories of living along the route of MVP.

The Judges’ final verdict recognized the inherent Rights of Rivers and their ecosystems, the inherent Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the inherent Rights of Nature. The Tribunal determined that: (1) the MVP is a violation of the Rights of Nature and should be stopped; (2) MVP Southgate extension should not be approved; (3) they recommend this case be elevated as an International Rights of Nature Tribunal; (4) they recommend this case be brought to other international bodies, including the UN; (5) they recommend this case be brought before appropriate federal, state and local agencies as a violation of existing law, including Endangered Species Act, and the Rights of Nature.

Led by the indigenous-led organization 7 Directions of Service along with partners Movement Rights and the Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature (GARN), it was the first Indigenous-led tribunal of its kind in global history.

Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2025. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor.https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/local-rights-of-nature-tribunal-yesah-2024/.

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Legal Document

Yesah Tribunal Verdict 2024
Access PDF

Additional Resources

Livestream recording: (ENGLISH)
Visit Resource
Event photo & video
Visit Resource
International Rights of Nature Tribunal: Yesah Tribunal 2024
Visit Resource

Footer

  • Monitor
  • Data
  • About
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Privacy Policy
© 2025 Eco Jurisprudence
Monitor – all rights reserved

Track ecological jurisprudence worldwide with our newsletter

Subscribe