• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Monitor
  • Data
    • Initiative Index
    • Report Initiative
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • English
    • Español

Toledo (USA) Charter Amendment: Lake Erie Bill of Rights

Ohio, USA
Failed in 2020, Ongoing
Local
Legislation
Rights Of Nature
Lake Erie
Freshwater Ecosystem
CELDF; Toledoans for Safe Water
Civil Society, NGO

Summary

In 2018, the NGO “Toledoans for Safe Water” campaigned to get a Lake Erie Bill of Rights (LEBOR) recognizing rights of Lake Erie on the ballot. The proposed bill was drafted with the help of lawyers from the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) and declared that “Lake Erie, and the Lake Erie watershed, possess the right to exist, flourish, and naturally evolve.” The measure passed in 2019, and the LEBOR was added to the municipal charter – becoming the first law in the US to recognize a specific ecosystem’s rights. However, the law was struck down by a federal judge in 2020.

In July 2019, the Ohio State legislature passed a budget bill that prohibited communities from enacting “rights of nature” laws after Toledo residents overwhelmingly voted for the Lake Erie Bill of Rights. The bill established that “nature… does not have standing to participate in or bring an action in any court.” In 2020, the State doubled down, passing a so-called “preemption law” in response to the city of Athens and Cuyahoga County (where Cleveland is located) passing laws banning single-use plastic bags.

Today, citizens of Ohio are pushing back. Residents of Columbus, Ohio are seeking to overturn this undemocratic process within their city. On May 15th 2025 they submitted a city charter amendment petition to the city, seeking to ask voters on the November 2027 ballot if they will reject state preemption and reaffirm the right to make decisions locally. The proposed amendment states that “the principle and practice of home rule and local self-government in Ohio, as established in 1912, has been increasingly infringed upon and eroded by state legislature overreach via the practice of state preemption,” including by preventing residents from legislating on important community issues such as “minimum wage protections, gun laws, oil and gas bans, rent control protections, knife laws, plastic bag bans, rights of nature, flavored tobacco bans, pesticide use, red-light camera use, telecommunication installations, natural gas hookup bans, puppy mill bans, paid leave, and many others.”

Involved Organizations

Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF)Toledoans for Safe Water

Related Initiatives

New York State (U.S.) Lake Erie Bill of Rights
Visit Initiative
New York State (U.S.) Great Lakes Bill of Rights
Visit Initiative

Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2025. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor.https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/lake-erie-bill-of-rights/.

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Legal Document

Lake Erie Bill of Rights
Access PDF

Media

This lake now has legal rights, just like you
VoxVideo
The Fight to Turn Lake Erie Into a Person
The Daily ShowVideo
Short Stuff: Lake Erie's Rights
Stuff Your Should KnowVideo
Legal Rights for Lake Erie? Voters in Ohio City Will Decide
The New York TimesArticle
How Algae Led to a Lake Erie Bill of Rights
Retro Local (PBS)Video
Federal Judge Strikes Down ‘Lake Erie Bill of Rights’
Animal Legal Defense FundArticle
2025 Press Release: Columbus, Ohio Residents Strike Back
CELDFArticle

Footer

  • Monitor
  • Data
  • About
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Privacy Policy
© 2025 Eco Jurisprudence
Monitor – all rights reserved

Track ecological jurisprudence worldwide with our newsletter

Subscribe