• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Monitor
  • Data
    • Initiative Index
    • Report Initiative
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • English

Innu First Nation Resolution: rights of the Magpie River

Nitassinan (Innu ancestral territory) (Quebec Province, Canada)
Approved in 2021
Indigenous Territory
Indigenous Law
Indigenous Model, Personhood, Rights Of Nature
Magpie River (Mutehekau Shipu)
Freshwater Ecosystem
Innu Council of Ekuanitshit; Muteshekau-shipu Alliance
Government, Indigenous

Summary

In January 2021, the Innu Council of Ekuanitshit adopted a resolution recognizing the Magpie River (Muteshekau-shipu in the Innu language) as a legal person with rights. This is the first of two parallel resolutions advanced by the Muteshekau-shipu Alliance. This is the first such case in Canada. This first resolution was followed by the Minganie Regional County Municipality (MRC) Rights of the Magpie River Resolution in February.

The Mutehekau Shipu/Magpie River is located in Nitassinan, the ancestral territory of the Innu people of the Ekuanitshit community; and more than 85% of the Magpie River lies within the territory of the Minganie Regional County Municipality (MRC).

Jurisprudential Framing
The resolutions mutually resolve to recognize the river as possessing nine rights, including the right to evolve naturally and be protected, to be free of pollution, and to have standing in court. Guardians for the river will be appointed on both sides by the Ekuanitshit Innu Council and the Minganie MRC. The river’s legal guardians will hold the primary responsibility for ensuring that these rights are respected, and empowered to take legal action on behalf of the Magpie River.

“The people closest to the river will be those watching over it from now on. The Innu of Ekuanitshit have always been the protectors of the Nitassinan [ancestral territory] and will continue to be so through the recognition of the rights of the Muteshekau-shipu river.” – Chief of the Innu Council of Ekuanitshit (Jean-Charles Piétacho)

Muteshekau-shipu Alliance
The Innu Council of Ekuanitshit defends the inherent and legitimate rights, interests and concerns of the Ekuanitshiunnuat and ensures that the well-being of community members is maintained. The founding members of the Muteshekau-shipu Alliance are the Innu Council of Ekuanitshit, the Minganie MRC, CPAWS Quebec, and the Association Eaux-Vives Minganie. The International Observatory on the Rights of Nature, based in Montreal, Canada, helped draft the resolutions in collaboration with the Alliance.

Involved Organizations

EkuanitshitMuteshekau-Shipu AllianceInternational Observatory on the Rights of Nature

Related Initiatives

Minganie County (Canada) Municipal Resolution: Rights of the Magpie River
Visit Initiative

Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2025. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor.https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/innu-first-nation-resolution-rights-of-the-magpie-river/.

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Legal Document

Innu Council Resolution
Access PDF

Media

I am Magpie - Film
Nikan ProductionsVideo
Press Release: For the first time, a river is granted official rights and legal personhood in Canada
Muteshekau-shipu AllianceArticle
Rights of Nature and Indigenous Peoples: Navigating a New Course
University of British Columbia Law SchoolArticle

Footer

  • Monitor
  • Data
  • About
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Privacy Policy
© 2025 Eco Jurisprudence
Monitor – all rights reserved

Track ecological jurisprudence worldwide with our newsletter

Subscribe