• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Monitor
  • Data
    • Initiative Index
    • Report Initiative
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • English
    • Español

Ecuador court case: Condor-Mirador mining project

Pichincha Province, Ecuador
Failed in 2013
Provincial
Court Case
Rights Of Nature
Nature
All Nature
A collection of indigenous movements, environmental and human rights NGOs, and community organizations
Civil Society, Indigenous, NGO

Summary

A collection of indigenous movements, environmental and human rights NGOs, and community organizations presented a lawsuit seeking protective action on behalf of nature against the Condor-Mirador Mining Project—Ecuador’s first, large-scale, open-pit mining project, which is located in a biodiversity hotspot. The protective action presented scientific studies, including those by the mining company Ecuacorriente, showing the open-pit mine would cause the total removal of various ecosystems, including the habitats on which endangered endemic species rely. Such actions would likely cause the extinction of one or more species and thus violate the rights of nature. Other violations relate to the contamination of watershed ecosystems with heavy metals and toxins. The plaintiffs ask for the suspension of the project and a more thorough environmental impact assessment.

The judge ruled the Condor-Mirador project did not violate rights of nature because the mining project would not affect a protected area, although a Ministry of Environment assessment showed it would, and that efforts to protect rights of nature are a private goal while Ecuacorriente was acting in the public interest of development. The judge ruled that the public interest takes precedence over private interest, and the judge denied the protective action. The claimants appealed to the Provincial Court of Pichincha but lost. No further legal action was taken.

Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2026. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/condor-mirador-case/.

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Legal Document

Condor Mirador Case, Provincial Court of Pichincha Judgment
Access PDF

Additional Resources

Pachamama Alliance - Mirador Mining Project Puts Rights of Nature Laws to the Test in Ecuador
Visit Resource

Footer

  • Monitor
  • Data
  • About
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Privacy Policy
© 2026 Eco Jurisprudence
Monitor – all rights reserved

Track ecological jurisprudence worldwide with our newsletter

Subscribe