• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Monitor
  • Data
    • Initiative Index
    • Report Initiative
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • English
    • Español

Ecuador court case: killing of an endangered Andean condor

Ecuador
Approved in 2015
National
Court Case
Animal Rights, Rights Of Nature
Andean condor
Animal
The Ministry of Environment; the Provincial Director of Environment Mininstry in Napo Province
Government

Summary

In 2013, the Ministry of Environment rescued and rehabilitated an injured Andean Condor, an endangered species. The condor was later found dead and shot by a hunter in the Napo province. The hunter was found and arrested in 2014. The Ministry of Environment submitted evidence to the District Attorney in Azuay. The hunter was charged with violating the rights of nature by killing an endangered species, which threatened the condors’ right to exist. The First Court of Criminal Guarantees of Azuay convicted the hunter and sentenced him to six months in prison.

Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2025. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor.https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/condor-arturo-case/.

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Legal Document

Condor Arturo Case First Judgment
Access PDF
Condor Arturo Case Appeals Judgment
Access PDF

Footer

  • Monitor
  • Data
  • About
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Privacy Policy
© 2025 Eco Jurisprudence
Monitor – all rights reserved

Track ecological jurisprudence worldwide with our newsletter

Subscribe