• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
eco-jurisprudence monitor logo

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Tracker
    • Report Initiative
    • Printable Charts
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • Toolkit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Our Story
    • Tracker FAQ
    • Get Involved
    • Contact Us
  • English
    • Español

Mexico Supreme Court case upholding a ban on cockfighting

Mexico
Veracruz
Approved in 2018
Case
Eco-Governance System
Rooster
Animal
Efraín Rábago Echegoyen, President of the Mexican Comisión for the promotion of the rooster (Comisión Mexicana de Promoción Gallística).
NGO

Summary

In 2018, a ban on cockfighting as part of the Animal Protection Bill of Veracruz State was challenged by the local cockfighting industry, claiming the ban violates the right to culture and property, among other human rights. A ruling by the Supreme Court stated that “no practice that involves the mistreatment and unnecessary suffering of animals can be considered a cultural expression protected by the [federal] constitution.” This rule established a precedent for the recognition of the rights of non-human animals.

Legal Document

To see the original legal document(s) for this initiative, click the links below:

Mexican Supreme Court Judgment on Cockfighting [PDF]

Additional Resources

To see other supplementary information related to this initiative, click the links below:

Mexico Supreme Court upholds cockfighting ban in Veracruz
Supreme Court rules Veracruz cockfight ban is constitutional
A Ban on Cockfighting but Tradition Lives On

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Footer

Privacy Policy

Contact

  • Tracker
  • News
  • About
  • English
  • Español

© 2025 Eco Jurisprudence Monitor – all rights reserved.