• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
eco-jurisprudence monitor logo

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • EJ Tracker
    • Report Initiative
    • Tracker FAQ
    • Codebook
    • Printable Charts
    • Data Ethics
    • Data Request
  • Resources
    • Eco Jurisprudence Tracker
    • Legal Toolkit
  • About
    • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Contact Us
  • English
    • Español

Ecuador court case on biodigestor machines by agroindustrial company PRONACA

Ecuador
National
Approved in 2009
Case
Rights Of Nature
Nature
All Nature
Collection of 16 community members from canton Santo Domingo de los Colorados
Civil Society

Summary

Beginning in 2003, citizens of the canton Santo Domingo de los Colorados complained to national government ministries about water, air, and soil contamination produced by a large-scale pork processing plant owned by the agroindustrial company PRONACA. After government administrative actions did not solve the problem, in 2009 claimants filed a lawsuit for protective action, requesting a stoppage of 6 new biodigestor machines that PRONACA was installing to process the release of methane gas caused by intensive pig farming. While the lawsuit noted the negative impacts on flora, fauna, and aquatic systems, it did not invoke RoN. Rather, claimants argued that PRONACA’s actions violated their constitutional rights to Health and a Safe and Clean Environment. It was the judge who applied RoN in the case. The judge considered Nature as one of the affected parties in the case, and looked at violations of the rights of Nature as established in the Ecuadorian constitution, as well as the human rights of health and enjoying a healthy environment.

The Constitutional Court heard the case in 2009. The judge ruled against the proposed protections and stoppage of the biodigestors. However, the judge ruled that the case involved potential violations of the rights of nature that needed to be protected. Invoking Articles 71-72 of the constitution, the judge ordered the creation of a commission to audit and monitor the biodigestors to ensure that the rights of nature, citizens, and communities would be protected. The ruling is significant in that the court acknowledged its right to invoke constitutional articles regarding Rights of Nature even when claimants did not specifically indicate such rights.

To see the original legal document(s) for this initiative, click the links below:

Ecuadorian Constitutional Court Judgment on Biodigestor Case [PDF]

To see other supplementary information related to this initiative, click the links below:

Summary of case

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Footer

Contact

  • EJ Tracker
  • Resources
  • About
earth law center
UN Harmony with Nature
Ecological Law and Governance Association
GARN logo
Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund

Subscribe to our newsletter:

Privacy Policy

© 2023 Eco Jurisprudence Monitor – all rights reserved.

  • English
  • Español