• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor

  • Monitor
  • Data
    • Initiative Index
    • Report Initiative
    • Data Request
    • Codebook
    • Data Ethics
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • English
    • Español

Bay Area (USA) People’s Tribunal: fossil fuels and rights of nature

California, USA
Approved in 2014
Local
Civil Society Tribunal
Rights Of Nature
Nature
All Nature
Bay Area Rights of Nature Alliance
Civil Society, Indigenous, NGO

Summary

In 2014, GARN held a people’s tribunal that convened the Bay Area Rights of Nature Alliance. The tribunal heard cases against Chevron and its refinery in Richmond. The tribunal found Chevron, its Richmond refinery, and the fossil fuel industry guilty of “violations to human rights and rights of natural ecosystems” and spoke about the importance of a future of living in harmony with nature through recognizing nature’s rights. The rulings call for defining new economic models, social systems, and governance structures to pursue this future.

Suggested Citation:
Kauffman, Craig, Catherine Haas, Alex Putzer, Shrishtee Bajpai, Kelsey Leonard, Elizabeth Macpherson, Pamela Martin, Alessandro Pelizzon & Linda Sheehan. Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. V2. 2025. Distributed by the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor.https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/bay-area-peoples-tribunal-on-rights-of-nature/.

When using our data, please follow the FAIR and CARE Principles for data governance outlined in our Ethics Statement. We are doing our best to be correct in the information we provide, but if you notice any omission or inaccuracy, please report this to us immediately at info@ecojurisprudence.org so we can correct it.

Eco Jurisprudence Tracker is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Legal Document

Bay Area People's Tribunal on Rights of Nature Ruling
Access PDF

Additional Resources

Tribunal website
Visit Resource

Footer

  • Monitor
  • Data
  • About
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Privacy Policy
© 2025 Eco Jurisprudence
Monitor – all rights reserved

Track ecological jurisprudence worldwide with our newsletter

Subscribe